Table 3.
Device failure for patients treated with PORTICO and ACURATE neo of the matched population.
| PORTICO | ACURATE Neo | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 344) | (n = 344) | ||
| Device failure 1 | 26 (7.6%) | 25 (7.3%) | 1.000 |
| Procedural related death | 1 (0.5%) | 4 (2.0%) | 0.372 |
| Significant paravalvular leakage (>Grade II) | 12 (3.5%) | 16 (4.8%) | 0.546 |
| Elevated gradient (>20 mmHg) | 4 (1.2%) | 5 (1.5%) | 0.752 |
| Multiple valves | 10 (2.9%) | 7 (2.0%) | 0.623 |
| Conversion to sternotomy | 5 (1.5%) | 2 (0.6%) | 0.451 |
Values are the mean ± SD, n (%). 1 Prothesis mismatch, mean aortic gradient ≥20 mmHg or peak velocity ≥3 m/s, moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation of the first implanted valve and multiple events possible.