Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;22(14):5089. doi: 10.3390/s22145089

Table 3.

Comparison of flexible sensors using different methods of contact.

Classification Material Preparation Method KPa
Linearity Range KPa
KPa−1
Sensitivity KPa−1
Cycling
Stability (Times)
Reference
Contact
Flexible sensors
PEN, PVDF-TrFE Chemical Vapor Deposition 40–200 0.15 200 [126]
AGNW, PVP, PET Sandpaper forming 0–4 0.0328 - [127]
PDMS, CIP, PEGDA Spin coating 0–2 0.301 5000 [128]
Non-contact
Flexible sensors
PEDOT, PSS, EG, OTS, PDMS Spray coating 1–5 0.1 2000 [129]
PPG, TDI, copper powder Ultrasonication 1.3–38.2 - 500 [130]
PVP, TEMPO, AgNW Wet Spinning 0–460 5.49 1200 [131]
SiO2, Si wafer, SigmaAldrich Photolithography 0.72–11.6 - 5000 [132]