Table 3.
Comparison of flexible sensors using different methods of contact.
Classification | Material | Preparation Method | KPa Linearity Range KPa |
KPa−1 Sensitivity KPa−1 |
Cycling Stability (Times) |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contact Flexible sensors |
PEN, PVDF-TrFE | Chemical Vapor Deposition | 40–200 | 0.15 | 200 | [126] |
AGNW, PVP, PET | Sandpaper forming | 0–4 | 0.0328 | - | [127] | |
PDMS, CIP, PEGDA | Spin coating | 0–2 | 0.301 | 5000 | [128] | |
Non-contact Flexible sensors |
PEDOT, PSS, EG, OTS, PDMS | Spray coating | 1–5 | 0.1 | 2000 | [129] |
PPG, TDI, copper powder | Ultrasonication | 1.3–38.2 | - | 500 | [130] | |
PVP, TEMPO, AgNW | Wet Spinning | 0–460 | 5.49 | 1200 | [131] | |
SiO2, Si wafer, SigmaAldrich | Photolithography | 0.72–11.6 | - | 5000 | [132] |