Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;14(14):3379. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143379

Table 3.

Prevalence of xerostomia, unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rate, stratified according to the type of treatment and gender in childhood cancer survivors.

Variable Total Group 1: No H&N RT Group 2: H&N RT Subgroup 2A: RT to Salivary Glands e p ¥ Male Female p µ
Xerostomia inventory (XI) (n) n = 233 n = 156 n = 77 n = 65 n = 125 n = 108
Median XI-score (range) a 17.00 (11.00–41.00) 17.00 (11.00–39.00) 16.00 (11.00–41.00) 17.00 (11.00–36.00) 0.980 ** 16.00 (11.00–39.00) 17.00 (11.00–41.00) 0.174 **
Mean XI-score (sd) a 17.77 (6.01) 17.80 (5.79) 17.71 (6.48) 17.75 (5.71) 17.20 (5.56) 18.44 (6.46)
Number with xerostomia (%) b 22 (9.4) 13 (8.3) 9 (11.7) 7 (10.8) 0.444 * 10 (8.0) 12 (11.1) 0.502 *
UWS (n) n = 269 n = 184 n = 85 n = 73 n = 144 n = 125
Median (range) c 0.29 (0.00–1.42) 0.31 (0.03–1.36) 0.21 (0.00–1.42) 0.21 (0.00–1.42) 0.003 ** 0.31 (0.00–1.42) 0.25 (0.01–1.36) 0.007 **
Mean (sd) c 0.35 (0.25) 0.37 (0.25) 0.30 (0.27) 0.31 (0.28) 0.39 (0.27) 0.30 (0.22)
Hyposalivation < 0.2 mL/min d 86 (32.0) 47 (25.5) 39 (45.9) 34 (46.6) 0.002 * 37 (25.7) 49 (39.2) 0.019 *
Severe hyposalivation < 0.1 mL/min d 24 (8.9) 11 (6.0) 13 (15.3) 10 (13.7) 0.074 * 8 (5.6) 16 (12.8) 0.052 *
SWS (n) n = 271 n = 186 n = 85 n = 73 n = 146 n = 125
Median (range) c 0.98 (0.01–4.03) 1.11 (0.01–3.35) 0.78 (0.01–4.03) 0.78 (0.01–4.03) 0.003 ** 1.14 (0.01–4.03) 0.83 (0.01–3.35) 0.001 **
Mean (sd) c 1.14 (0.71) 1.20 (0.69) 0.99 (0.73) 0.98 (0.73) 1.27 (0.76) 0.98 (0.61)
Hyposalivation < 0.7 mL/min d 86 (31.7) 48 (25.8) 38 (44.7) 33 (45.2) 0.004 * 37 (25.3) 49 (39.2) 0.018 *
Severe hyposalivation < 0.5 mL/min d 38 (14.0) 21 (11.3) 17 (20.0) 13 (17.8) 0.219 * 13 (8.9) 25 (20.0) 0.013 *

UWS; unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, SWS; stimulated whole salivary flow rate. Numbers of XI-scores, UWS values, and SWS values were different as not all parameters were measured in each individual. ¥ p value of the analysis between Group 1 (participant with unknown information about radiotherapy was excluded from analysis) and the subgroup: RT to salivary glands. µ p value of the analysis between males and females. a XI scores are presented [23]. b Values are presented as n (%) of participants that had an XI score above 25. c Values are presented as mL/min d Values are presented as n (%) of participants who had hyposalivation. e This subgroup is part of Group 2. Survivors were excluded from this subgroup when information on radiotherapy to salivary glands was unclear (n = 6) or salivary glands did not receive irradiation (n = 6). * Fisher’s exact test. ** Mann–Whitney U test.