Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;14(14):3379. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143379

Table 4.

Association between objective stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow measurements and xerostomia (data are presented as n (total %)).

Variable UWS, >0.2 mL/min UWS, ≤0.2 mL/min Total p *
SWS, >0.7 mL/min 150 (55.8) 34 (12.6) 184 (68.4) <0.001
≤0.7 mL/min 33 (12.3) 52 (19.3) 85 (31.6)
Total 183 (68.0) 86 (32.0) 269 (100.0)
No xerostomia Xerostomia Total p *
UWS, >0.2 mL/min 129 (61.4) 12 (5.7) 141 (67.1) 0.332
≤0.2 mL/min 60 (28.6) 9 (4.3) 69 (32.9)
Total 189 (90.0) 21 (10.0) 210 (100.0)
No xerostomia Xerostomia a Total p *
SWS, >0.7 mL/min 133 (62.7) 15 (7.1) 148 (69.8) 1.000
≤0.7 mL/min 57 (26.9) 7 (3.3) 64 (30.2)
Total 190 (89.6) 22 (10.4) 212 (100.0)

UWS; unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, SWS; stimulated whole salivary flow rate. a Values are presented as n (%) of participants that had an XI score above 25. * Chi-square test.