Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 13;22(14):5250. doi: 10.3390/s22145250

Table 6.

Performance of the method in the seen scenario, including the average and 90% interval of each load over twenty experiments and the average of all loads.

AHU0 AHU1 AHU2 AHU5 Avg
Avg 90% Interval Avg 90% Interval Avg 90% Interval Avg 90% Interval
F1 0.892 (0.817,0.944) 0.951 (0.865,0.996) 0.992 (0.991,0.993) 0.991 (0.983,0.994) 0.957
Precision 0.986 (0.964,1.000) 0.978 (0.884,1.000) 0.998 (0.997,0.999) 0.990 (0.973,0.995) 0.988
Recall 0.819 (0.691,0.912) 0.928 (0.836,0.996) 0.986 (0.983,0.989) 0.992 (0.987,0.994) 0.931
Accuracy 0.938 (0.901,0.965) 0.979 (0.948,0.998) 0.994 (0.993,0.995) 0.994 (0.988,0.996) 0.976
MCC 0.859 (0.777,0.920) 0.940 (0.845,0.995) 0.988 (0.985,0.990) 0.986 (0.974,0.991) 0.943
MAE 185.19 (121.69,270.67) 142.76 (108.08,220.30) 80.41 (77.92,83.34) 380.09 (365.31,438.53) 197.13
SAE −0.148 (−0.292,−0.037) −0.059 (−0.174,0.071) −0.057 (−0.061,−0.053) 0.070 (0.060,0.090) −0.049