Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;10(7):1182. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071182

Table 1.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Participants.

Number of Participants, Etiology, and Diagnostic Accuracy
Author, Year Unilateral Vestibulopathy Bilateral Vestibulopathy Comparators Age Sex NOS Score
Casani AP., 2021 [12] 30 Unspecified. NA HIMP Mean 61.50 ± 17.74 19 F,
11 M
7
Malara P., 2021 [13] NA 1 Neuroborreliosis. HIMP, VEMPs 72 1 F 3
Manzari L., 2020 [4] 15 Vestibular Neuritis. NA HIMP Mean 58.73 ± 10.73 6 F,
9 M
6
Park JS., 2020 [7] 21 Vestibular Neuritis, 95% sensitivity, 91% specificity. NA HIMP NA NA 6
Lee JY., 2020 [14] 27 Vestibular Neuritis. NA HIMP Mean 56.37 ± 12.69 17 M,
10 F
6
Kirazli G., 2020 [19] 3 Vestibular Neuritis, 7 Menière’s disease. 6 Idiopathic. HIMP, fHIT Mean 57.33 ± 6.53 (Bilateral); 50.30 ± 10.02 (Unilateral) NA 6
Ramos BF., 2019 [21] 20 Vestibular Neuritis. 3 Idiopathic HIMP, VVOR,
VORS
Ranged from 20 to 75 years. NA 4
de Waele C., 2017 [16] NA 3 Gentamicin,
1 Genetic, 4 Idiopathic.
HIMP Mean 56 ± 16; NA 4
Rey-Martinez J., 2017 [17] 95 Unspecified. NA HIMP Mean 48.44 ± 2.65 NA 7
Shen Q., 2016 [18] 13 Menière’s disease,
38 Operated schwannoma. 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in the acute phase. 87% sensitivity and 83% specificity in chronic phase.
6 Idiopathic
100% sensitivity and
100% specificity.
HIMP, Caloric Mean 58 ± 13 34 M,
23 F
7
MacDougall HG., 2016 [3] 5 Operated schwannoma. 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. 2 Gentamicin, 3 Idiopathic. 100% sensitivity
and 100% specificity.
HIMP NA NA 5

NA = Not Applicable; NOS = Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; HIMP = head impulse paradigm; VEMPs = vestibular evoked myogenic potentials; fHIT = functional head impulse test; VVOR = visually enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex; VORS = vestibulo-ocular reflex suppression; DA = diagnostic accuracy.