Table 3.
Trial | Phase | Treatment | n | Primary Endpoint | Results | Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATRICIA | II | Palbociclib 200 mg 2 w on 1 w off or 125 3 w on 1 w off + H 600 mg sc every 3 w ER+ patients were treated with Letrozole vs. Placebo |
71 (56 ER+) |
PFS at 6 m | 6 m PFS in ER+ patients treated with Palbociclib + H 42.8% vs. 46.4% Luminal disease by PAM50 had longer PFS (10.6 m vs. 4.2 m) |
Similar potency against CDK 4 than CDK 6 |
Ribociclib, NCT02657343 | Ib/II | Ribociclib 400 mg daily (phase II) + H iv | 13 (ER + in 8) |
MTD and CBR | 1 experienced stable disease >24 w PFS was 1.3 m |
Greater potency against CDK 4 than CDK 6 |
Ribociclib, NCT02657343 | Ib | Ribociclib 400 mg given on days 8–21 of a 21-day cycle with T-DM1 | 12 | MTD for phase II | PFS was 10.4 m | Greater potency against CDK 4 than CDK 6 |
MonarchHER | II | A: Abemaciclib 150 mg/12 h + H iv B: Abemaciclib + BPC ChT C: Abemaciclib + fulvestrant im + H iv |
237 physician’s choice (all HER+/ER+) | PFS between groups | Abemaciclib + H + Fulvestrant longer PFS: 8.3 m vs. 5.7 m and 5.7 m compared with the other groups | Greater potency against CDK 4 than CDK 6, also CDK 1/2/5 inhibitor |
PATINA | III | H + P with endocrine therapy (letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane or fulvestrant) +/- palbociclib | 496 already recruited | PFS | Not reported yet | Similar potency against CDK 4 than CDK 6 |
ASPIRE | I/II | Palbociclib (100 and 125 mg 3 w on 1 w off) + H iv + P iv + Anastrozole | 36 planned | DLT, MTD, CBR | Not reported yet | Similar potency against CDK 4 than CDK 6 |
MTD: Maximum Tolerated Dose; PFS: Progression-Free survival; CBR: Clinical Benefit Rate; BPC: best physician’s choice; ROR: rate of overall response; DLT: dose limiting toxicity; iv: intravenous; im: intramuscular; sc: subcutaneous, H: trastuzumab; P: pertuzumab; ChT: chemotherapy; m: months; w: weeks.