Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148358

Table 1.

Dependent results of the study.

Physical Well-Being Gender
N = 1749
Age
N = 1783
Boys
N = 903
Girls
N = 846
9–12
N = 275
13–15
N = 591
16–17
N = 654
18–20
N = 263
It was terrible, and with distance education, it became even worse 9.1% 11.3% 5.5% 12.0% 13.1% 12.9%
It was terrible, and with distance education, it stayed that way 7.3% 11.0% 5.5% 11.5% 10.1% 8.4%
It was terrible, and with distance education, it became good 10.6% 9.0% 5.5% 5.9% 13.6% 12.2%
It was good, and with distance education, it became terrible 33.3% 36.5% 40.4% 38.1% 29.5% 31.2%
It was good, and with distance education, it stayed that way 29.7% 24.6% 32.4% 24.0% 24.2% 28.1%
It was good, and with distance education, it became even better 10.0% 7.6% 10.9% 8.5% 9.5% 7.2%
Leisure Time Gender
N = 1749
Age
N = 1783
Boys
N = 903
Girls
N = 846
9–12
N = 275
13–15
N = 591
16–17
N = 654
18–20
N = 263
It was terrible, and with distance education, it became even worse 6.1% 7.0% 2.9% 7.6% 7.2% 7.2%
It was terrible, and with distance education, it stayed that way 8.1% 7.2% 5.5% 8.8% 8.9% 6.8%
It was terrible, and with distance education, it became good 13.7% 15.2% 9.8% 14.0% 16.5% 17.9%
It was good, and with distance education, it became terrible 20.0% 26.6% 22.5% 22.3% 23.4% 24.3%
It was good, and with distance education, it stayed that way 33.6% 30.9% 42.2% 33.8% 26.1% 28.9%
It was good, and with distance education, it became even better 18.5% 13.1% 17.1% 13.4% 17.9% 14.8%