Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148358

Table 3.

Dependent results of the study in subgroups by age and by gender.

Physical Well-Being 9–12
N = 255
13–15
N = 539
16–17
N = 616
18–20
N = 250
Boys
N = 116
Girls
N = 139
Boys
N = 287
Girls
N = 252
Boys
N = 321
Girls
N = 295
Boys
N = 141
Girls
N = 109
It was terrible, and with distance education, it became even worse 4.3% 6.5% 10.1% 11.1% 9.7% 13.9% 7.1% 14.7%
It was terrible, and with distance education, it stayed that way 5.2% 5.8% 9.4% 11.5% 6.9% 13.9% 7.1% 10.1%
It was terrible, and with distance education, it became good 6.0% 5.0% 7.7% 4.8% 14.3% 12.5% 12.1% 12.8%
It was good, and with distance education, it became terrible 39.7% 38.8% 38.0% 41.7% 28.7% 31.2% 31.9% 32.1%
It was good, and with distance education, it stayed that way 31.0% 35.3% 26.8% 23.0% 29.0% 21.0% 34.0% 22.9%
It was good, and with distance education, it became even better 13.8% 8.6% 8.0% 7.9% 11.5% 7.5% 7.8% 7.3%
Leisure Time 9–12
N = 255
13–15
N = 539
16–17
N = 616
18–20
N = 250
Boys
N = 116
Girls
N = 139
Boys
N = 287
Girls
N = 252
Boys
N = 321
Girls
N = 295
Boys
N = 141
Girls
N = 109
It was terrible, and with distance education, it became even worse 5.2% 1.4% 7.0% 7.9% 6.2% 7.1% 3.5% 11.0%
It was terrible, and with distance education, it stayed that way 6.0% 4.3% 7.7% 8.7% 10.0% 6.8% 7.1% 7.3%
It was terrible, and with distance education, it became good 6.9% 12.2% 12.5% 13.9% 15.6% 16.3% 17.0% 18.3%
It was good, and with distance education, it became terrible 22.4% 22.3% 18.1% 28.6% 19.3% 29.5% 24.8% 23.9%
It was good, and with distance education, it stayed that way 42.2% 43.9% 37.6% 32.1% 26.8% 25.8% 33.3% 24.8%
It was good, and with distance education, it became even better 17.2% 15.8% 17.1% 8.7% 22.1% 14.6% 14.2% 14.7%