Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;28(32):e202200657. doi: 10.1002/chem.202200657

Table 1.

Screening of chiral bidentate ligands.

graphic file with name CHEM-28-0-g010.jpg

Entry

Ligand*2

2 a [%][a]

ee of 2 a [%]

3 a [%][a]

1

(R)‐SEGPHOS

99

73

0

2

(R)‐DM‐SEGPHOS

94

75

0

3

(R)‐DTBM‐SEGPHOS

21

n.d.

23

4

(R)‐BINAP

18[b]

83

0[b]

5

(R)‐Tol‐BINAP

87

92

0

6

(R)‐DM‐BINAP

72

16

17

7

(R)‐Cy‐BINAP

17[c]

29

trace[c]

8

(S)‐H8‐BINAP

88

90[d]

trace

9

(R)‐MeO‐BIPHEP

99

84

0

10

(S)‐SYNPHOS

99

65

trace

11

(R)‐DTBM‐ MeO‐BIPHEP

23[e]

n.d.

23[e]

[a] Yields were determined by 19F NMR using BTF as an internal standard. [b] 74 % Recovery of 1 a. [c] 60 % Recovery of 1 a. [d] Enantiomer of 2 a (ent‐2 a) was characterized by HPLC analysis. [e] 51 % Recovery of 1 a.