TABLE 3.
Tree |
|
|
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||
A01 analysis | ||||||||
Tree B (Figure 1a) | 0.05 | 0.7 (0.49) | 0.7 (0.48) | 0.9 (0.42) | 0.9 (0.41) | |||
0.5 | 7.2 (0.00) | 7.2 (0.00) | 8.7 (0.00) | 8.7 (0.00) | ||||
5 | 67.6 (0.00) | 67.8 (0.00) | 80.5 (0.00) | 80.6 (0.00) | ||||
Tree U (Figure 1b) | 0.05 | 0.7 (0.49) | 0.7 (0.49) | 0.9 (0.43) | 0.9 (0.42) | |||
0.5 | 7.1 (0.00) | 7.1 (0.00) | 8.5 (0.00) | 8.6 (0.00) | ||||
5 | 66.5 (0.00) | 66.4 (0.00) | 79.3 (0.00) | 79.5 (0.00) | ||||
A11 analysis | ||||||||
Shallow (Figure 2a) | 0.05 | 0.5 (0.63) | 0.5 (0.63) | 0.6 (0.57) | 0.6 (0.57) | |||
0.5 | 4.7 (0.01) | 4.7 (0.01) | 5.7 (0.00) | 5.7 (0.00) | ||||
5 | 45.2 (0.00) | 45.1 (0.00) | 53.9 (0.00) | 53.6 (0.00) | ||||
Deep (Figure 2b) | 0.05 | 0.2 (0.85) | 0.2 (0.85) | 0.3 (0.78) | 0.3 (0.78) | |||
0.5 | 1.6 (0.00) | 1.6 (0.00) | 2.5 (0.09) | 2.5 (0.09) | ||||
5 | 15.8 (0.00) | 15.9 (0.00) | 24.6 (0.00) | 24.5 (0.00) | ||||
A00 analysis | ||||||||
Tree B (Figure 3a) | 0.05 | 0.6 (0.54) | 0.6 (0.54) | 0.8 (0.46) | 0.8 (0.46) | |||
0.5 | 6.2 (0.00) | 6.2 (0.00) | 7.8 (0.00) | 7.7 (0.00) | ||||
5 | 58.8 (0.00) | 58.8 (0.00) | 72.4 (0.00) | 72.4 (0.00) | ||||
Tree U (Figure 3b) | 0.05 | 0.6 (0.57) | 0.6 (0.56) | 0.7 (0.49) | 0.7 (0.48) | |||
0.5 | 5.7 (0.00) | 5.7 (0.00) | 7.2 (0.00) | 7.3 (0.00) | ||||
5 | 54.3 (0.00) | 54.1 (0.00) | 67.9 (0.00) | 67.9 (0.00) |
The results are averages over the 100 replicate data sets of = 160 loci. The expected number of recombinations increases with the number of sequences () and is proportional to the recombination rate (), but independent of the mutation rate ().