Skip to main content
. 2022 May 5;80(7):1102–1111. doi: 10.1111/his.14655

Table 1.

Morphological and immunohistochemical features of microglandular hyperplasia (MGH) and endometrioid carcinoma (EMCA)

Gland architecture Luminal secretions/mucin Subnuclear vacuoles Foamy histiocytes Inflammation Squamous metaplasia Cytological atypia Mitotic figures per 10 HPF, mean (range) p63 positivity Loss of PTEN expression
Small tightly packed Medium to large tightly packed
MGH (n = 26) 25 (96%) 1 (4%) 15 (58%) 10 (38%) 1 (4%) 26 (100%) 5 (19%) 0 (0%) 0.1 (0–2) 26 (100%) 1 (4%)*
EMCA (n = 25) 9 (36%) 16 (64%) 18 (72%) 1** (4%) 6 (24%) 22 (88%) 5 (20%) 23 (92%) 23 (1–25) 4 (16%)*** 20 (91%) ****

Bold type indicates statistically significant differences (P‐values as follows: gland architecture 0.000, subnuclear vacuoles 0.003, foamy histiocytes 0.037, cytological atypia 0.000, p63 positivity 0.000, loss of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) expression 0.000) HPF, high‐power field.

*

24 MGH cases stained;

**

one case showed focal subnuclear vacuoles;

***

one case showed staining in squamous differentiation, three cases showed focal non‐specific staining;

****

22 EMCA cases stained.