Skip to main content
. 2022 May 12;88(3):1273–1281. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29273

FIGURE 4.

MRM-29273-FIG-0004-c

(Left) Comparison of qT2 images through the multi‐element phantom and (Right) Mean phantom multi‐orientation + multi‐TE and reference Hyperfine 5‐TE qT2 values. The solid line corresponds to the line of unity, and errors bars in the phantom measurements denote 1 SD. ICC values for the phantom data were 0.97 (with denoising) and 0.96 (without denoising)