Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 13;22(14):5243. doi: 10.3390/s22145243

Table 6.

Experimental results of the comparative experiment.

Data Category Recall
Raw Data
(Amount)
Over Sampling
(Amount)
Under Sampling
(Amount)
CTTGAN
(Amount)
BENIGN 0.9864 (100,000) 0.9829 (100,000) 0.9433 (1500) 0.9904 (100,000)
DoS Hulk 1.0000 (10,000) 0.9925 (10,000) 1.0000 (1500) 0.9980 (10,000)
PortScan 0.9990 (10,000) 0.9990 (10,000) 1.0000 (1500) 0.9990 (10,000)
DDoS 0.9975 (10,000) 0.9985 (10,000) 1.0000 (1500) 0.9980 (10,000)
DoS GoldenEye 0.9990 (10,000) 0.9995 (10,000) 0.9967 (1500) 0.9980 (10,000)
FTP-Patator 0.9975 (7894) 0.9981 (7894) 0.9867 (1500) 0.9968 (7894)
SSH-Patator 0.9906 (5861) 0.9915 (5861) 0.9933 (1500) 0.9881 (5861)
DoS slowloris 0.9922 (5771) 0.9931 (5771) 0.9900 (1500) 0.9913 (5771)
DoS slowhttptest 0.9909 (5485) 0.9918 (5485) 0.9967 (1500) 0.9909 (5485)
Bot 0.7918 (1943) 0.9720 (5000) 0.9967 (1500) 0.9980 (5000)
Web Attack Brute Force 0.9431 (1497) 0.9530 (5000) 0.9467 (1497) 0.9960 (5000)

Note: Red indicates the Recall index of small category samples in the CTTGAN scheme, all of which are above 0.99.