Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;19(14):8251. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148251

Table 1.

Body mass composition.

Baseline (n = 30) Follow-Up—Baseline (n = 30) p Value Effect Size SRM
Weight [kg] # 87.6 ± 16.9 −1.46 ± 3.31 0.022 * −0.4406 −0.4411
MBF [kg] # 32.0 ± 9.72 −1.8 ± 2.36 <0.001 * −0.7617 −0.7627
PBF [%] # 36.1 ± 6.86 −1.43 ± 1.59 <0.001 * −0.8971 −0.8994
VFL [Units] $ 16.0 [13.0–18.0] −0.867 [0–1.75] <0.001 * −0.87619 −0.8337
VFA [cm2] # 169 ± 79.1 −21.9 ± 23.9 <0.001 * −0.9162 −0.9163
WHR # 0.948 ± 0.0912 −0.022 ± 0.0282 <0.001 * −0.7798 −0.7801
AC [cm] # 98.1 ± 13.0 −2.16 ± 2.84 <0.001 * −0.7618 −0.7606
MBF Lt.ARM [kg] # 1.93 ± 0.612 −0.0777 ± 0.149 0.008 * −0.5227 −0.5215
MBF Rt.ARM [kg] # 1.91 ± 0.625 −0.088 ± 0.159 0.005 * −0.5518 −0.5535
MBF Lt.LEG [kg] # 5.84 ± 1.75 −0.345 ± 0.442 <0.001 * −0.7810 −0.7805
MBF Rt.LEG [kg] # 5.83 ± 1.76 −0.362 ± 0.444 <0.001 * −0.8146 −0.8153
MBF Trunk [kg] # 16.5 ± 4.98 −0.924 ± 1.2 <0.001 * −0.7666 −0.7700

Values are presented as mean ± SD or median [Q1–Q3]. * Two-sided p value < 0.05. # Paired t-test, Cohen’s d (effect size). $ Wilcoxon’s matched pairs signed rank test, Rank biserial correlation (effect size). SRM—standardised response mean.