Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;13(7):562. doi: 10.3390/insects13070562

Table 5.

Superiority of Interceptor® G2 over Interceptor® using 100 versus 50 resistant mosquitoes: The difference in the odds of mosquito at 24 h (M24) and 72 h (M72) and blood feeding success (BFS) for pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis exposed to Interceptor® G2 and Interceptor® in the gold standard rabbit-100 and 50-rabbit mosquitoes *.

Treatment 100-Rabbit 50-Rabbit
BFS M72 BFS M72
OR (95% CI) p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value
Overall
Interceptor® 1 1 1 1 1
Interceptor® G2 1.76 (1.55–1.99) <0.001 1.23 (1.13–1.33) <0.001 12.93 (9.63–17.36) <0.001 1.41 (1.26–1.57) <0.001
Unwashed
Interceptor® 1 1 1 1 1
Interceptor® G2 1.64 (1.38–1.95) <0.001 1.15 (1.02–1.29) 0.018 8.50 (5.95–12.15) <0.001 1.83 (1.56–2.14) <0.001
Washed 20×
Interceptor® 1 1 1 1 1
Interceptor® G2 1.90 (1.58–2.27) <0.001 1.31 (1.17–1.47) <0.001 24.34 (14.16–41.85) <0.001 1.07 (0.85–1.34) 0.432

* Mosquitoes were exposed for 12 h in the tunnel. Data presented are a mean proportion (%) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) as well as odds ratios (OR) derived from regression analysis with 95% CI, adjusted for net conditions.