Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;13(7):562. doi: 10.3390/insects13070562

Table 7.

Superiority of Interceptor® G2 over Interceptor® was estimated by comparing the membrane assay to the gold standard assay with pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. The difference in the odds of mosquito at 72-h (M72) and blood feeding success (BFS) for resistant Anopheles arabiensis measuring the superiority of Interceptor® G2 and Interceptor® with the gold standard with 100-rabbit compared to 50-membrane bioassays *.

Treatment 100-Rabbit 50-Membrane
BFS M72 BFS M72
OR (95% CI) p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value
Overall
Interceptor® 1 1 1 1
Interceptor® G2 1.76 (1.47–2.10) <0.001 1.23 (1.10–1.38) <0.001 1.87 (1.05–3.33) 0.033 1.79 (1.50–2.14) <0.001
Unwashed
Interceptor® 1 1 1 1
Interceptor® G2 1.64 (1.28–2.09) <0.001 1.15 (0.98–1.35) 0.094 2.34 (1.11–4.93) 0.025 1.81 (1.43–2.29) <0.001
Washed 20×
Interceptor® 1 1 1 1
Interceptor® G2 1.90 (1.47–2.45) <0.001 1.31 (1.12–1.54) 0.001 1.26 (0.49–3.20) 0.634 1.82 (1.39–2.37) <0.001

* For the gold standard, 100-mosquitoes with rabbit and 50-mosquito with 2 Hemotek® membrane feeders augmented with worn socks were used in the WHO tunnel bioassay, adjusted for net type and condition.