Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;93(2):256–264. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003525

TABLE 3.

Overview of Expert Panel Responses Regarding the Training of Bleeding Control Providers, Registries, and Guidelines

Training: Panel Members Agreeing (n) Consensus Reached
(1) A training curriculum for ABC modalities should include all of the following: a didactic component, simulator skills, animal laboratory skills and cadaver skills 23/27; 85.2% Yes
(2) Endovascular bleeding control skills should be a standard part of the training curriculum for military care providers 23/27; 85.2% Yes
(3) There should be an official guideline dictating the frequency of ABC training 25/27; 92.6% Yes
(4) Providing physicians should follow refresher training for ABC skills in general at least every 2 years and before deployment 22/28; 78.6% Yes
(5) Training of endovascular bleeding control skills should be refreshed more frequently than other bleeding control skills training 20/27; 74.1% Yes
(6) Providing physicians should follow refresher training for endovascular bleeding control skills at least annually and before any deployment 24/28; 85.7% Yes
(7) Providing nonphysicians should follow refresher training for ABC skills at least annually and before any deployment 26/28; 92.9% Yes
Registries and guidelines: Panel members agreeing (n) Consensus reached
(8) There should be an international collaboration to formulate best CPGs and recommendations on bleeding control care 19/27; 70.4% Yes
(9) In addition to an international CPG dictating bleeding control care, each nation should be able to make its own nation-specific adjustments 26/28; 92.9% Yes
(10) In a formal CPG dictating bleeding control care, REBOA should be explicitly discussed 27/27; 100% Yes
(11) There should be an international collaboration to register patients in whom ABC devices are deployed in an international registry 20/27; 74.1% Yes
(12) There should be an international collaboration to collect data on bleeding control to capture “lessons learned” or for process improvement 19/27; 70.4% Yes
(13) There should be an international collaboration to capture data on REBOA use other than the patient case history to capture “lessons learned” or for process improvement 23/27; 85.2% Yes