Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 14;9(7):1050. doi: 10.3390/children9071050

Table 2.

AGREE II assessment results and domain scores for the four included CPGs *.

Source CPGs/AGREE II Domains Scores (%) ACRC
2018 [35]
NZ
2016 [36]
NICE
2017 [37]
SIGN
2019 [38]
Domain 1. Scope and Purpose
Items 1–3: Objectives; health question(s); population (patients, public, etc.)
99% 93% 96% 97%
Domain 2. Stakeholder Involvement
Items 4–6: Group membership; target population preferences and views; target users
99% 71% 72% 79%
Domain 3. Rigor of development
Items 7–14: Search methods; evidence selection criteria; strengths and limitations of the evidence; formulation of recommendations; consideration of benefits and harms; link between recommendations and evidence; external review; updating procedure.
84% 86% 93% 85%
Domain 4. Clarity and presentation
Items 15–17: Specific and unambiguous recommendations; management options; identifiable key recommendations
93% 94% 97% 93%
Domain 5. Applicability
Items 18–21: Facilitators and barriers to application; implementation advice/tools; resource implications; monitoring/auditing criteria
92% 54% 89% 85%
Domain 6. Editorial independence
Items 22, 23: Funding body; competing interests
92% 69% 92% 92%
Overall Assessment 1
(Overall quality)
92% 88% 96% 92%
Overall Assessment 2
(Recommend the CPG for use by four appraisers)
Yes—3, Yes with modifications—1, No—0 Yes—4, Yes with modifications—0, No—0 Yes—2, Yes with modifications—2, No—0 Yes—2, Yes with modifications—2, No—0

* AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation Version II Instrument); Australian Autism CRC (ACRC); Ministry of Health New Zealand (NZ); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Healthcare Improvement Scotland (SIGN-HIS). This AGREE II domain scores table is a standard template with a constant set of attributes that have been reported in most similar reports of AGREE II assessment of guidelines (example: Alhasan, K.A., Al Khalifah, R., Aloufi, M. et al. AGREEing on clinical practice guidelines for idiopathic steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children. Syst Rev 10, 144 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01666-w).