Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 18;14(14):3492. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143492

Table 4.

Comparison among different studies on TMB prediction.

Study Method Summary Kind of Cancer Result
Jain et al. [14] Machine learning algorithm, Image2TMB, integrated three deep learning models. Lung cancer auPRC = 0.92
Precision = 0.89
Shi et al. [15] Deep learning model is based on the ResNet18 architecture. Lung cancer AUC = 0.64
Shimada et al. [16] Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithm. Colorectal cancer AUC = 0.934
Tang et al. [23] LASSO regression selected features. Nomogram model predicted TMB. Bladder cancer AUC = 0.853
Liu et al. [24] Nomogram model predicted TMB. Lower-grade glioma AUC = 0.736
The proposed study The genetic algorithm selected radiomics signatures. LGBM algorithm predicted TMB. Lower-grade glioma AUC = 0.7875
auPRC = 0.7556

Only Liu et al. predicted TMB on LGG patients and our proposed study achieved a better performance than this study.