Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;10(7):1229. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071229

Table 3.

Assessment of the measurement model. Estimated constructs in Mode A.

Loading t-Student *** Q2 α ρA ρC AVE
CWT 0.065 0.907 0.925 0.924 0.578
CWT_1 0.705 24.486 0.119
CWT_2 0.829 33.925 0.039
CWT_3 0.752 22.809 0.050
CWT_4 0.806 30.042 0.090
CWT_5 0.859 42.276 0.057
CWT_6 0.486 7.238 0.034
CWT_7 0.701 19.345 -0.003
CWT_8 0.794 26.787 0.090
CWT_9 0.843 21.615 0.107
OWT 0.300 0.850 0.906 0.892 0.594
OWT_1 0.899 54.603 0.474
OWT_2 0.889 85.233 0.451
OWT_3 0.448 6.746 0.019
OWT_4 0.801 21.466 0.316
OWT_5 0.546 12.146 0.121
OWT_6 0.907 64.808 0.418

Significance performed by bootstrapping procedure with 10,000 replications. Q2: cross-validated redundancies index performed using a nine-step distance-blindfolding procedure. α: Cronbach’s alpha; ρA: Dijkstra and Henseler’s composite reliability; ρC: Jöreskog’s composite reliability; AVE: Average Variance Extracted; ***: all loadings are significant at the 0.001 level.