Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;10(7):1229. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071229

Table A2.

Assessment of the structural model for women.

WOMEN Path SD T-Value f2 95 CI H Supported
Direct effects VIF
Expenses -> CWT −0.352 0.050 7.032 *** 0.142 [−0.452; −0.287] 1.000
Expenses -> OWT −0.331 0.054 6.141 *** 0.201 [−0.423; −0.246] 1.142
ED -> Satisfaction 0.148 0.122 1.217 ns 0.027 [−0.114; 0.301] 1.139
CWT -> Satisfaction −0.137 0.139 0.979 ns 0.014 [−0.345; 0.118] 1.876
CWT -> OWT 0.537 0.047 11.435 *** 0.529 [0.454; 0.609] 1.142
OWT -> Satisfaction −0.463 0.354 1.310 ns 0.173 [−0.618; −0.569] 1.746 H1 No
Indirect effects VAF
Individual indirect effects
Expenses -> CWT -> OWT −0.189 0.032 5.823 *** [−0.252; −0.145] 36.27 H2 Yes
Expenses -> CWT -> Satisfaction 0.048 0.054 0.894 ns [−0.045; 0.135] 16.61 H3 No
CWT -> OWT -> Satisfaction −0.249 0.188 1.322 ns [−0.364; 0.283] 64.67 H4 No
Expenses -> CWT -> OWT-> Satisfaction 0.088 0.075 1.666 ns [−0.106; 0.156] 30.45 H5 No
Expenses -> OWT -> Satisfaction 0.153 0.129 1.188 ns [−0.215; 0.228] 52.94 H6 No
Global indirect effects
Expenses -> Satisfaction 0.289 0.212 1.366 ns [−0.321; 0.381] 100.00
Expenses -> OWT −0.189 0.032 5.823 *** [−0.222; −0.132] 36.27
CWT -> Satisfaction −0.249 0.188 1.322 ns [−0.364; 0.283] 64.67
Total effect
Expenses -> Satisfaction 0.289 0.212 1.366 ns [−0.321; 0.381]
Expenses -> OWT −0.521 0.057 9.172 *** [−0.638; −0.451]
CWT -> Satisfaction −0.385 0.247 1.558 ns [−0.536; 0.319]
OWT -> Satisfaction −0.463 0.354 1.310 ns [−0.618; 0.569]

R2 adjusted [95% CI in brackets]: CWT: 0.124 [0.073; 0.249]; OWT: 0.523 [0.445; 0.638]; satisfaction: 0.281 [0.206; 0.421]; standardized path values reported. SD: Standard Deviation; f2: size effect index, values greater than 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 represent small, medium, and large effect sizes; 95CI: 95% Bias-Corrected Confidence Interval; VIF: inner model Variance Inflation Factors; VAF: Variance Accounted Formula x 100 represents the proportion mediated. Significance, Standard Deviations, and 95% Bias-Corrected CIs were performed after applying bootstrap re-sampling for 10,000 subsamples; ***: p < 0.001. Only total effects that differed from direct effects are shown.