TABLE 4.
Effect of MHC Class I genotypes on the ability to resolve a Chlamydia infection for the UA (a) and UC (b) genes
| Model | k | Deviance | AICC | ΔAICC | AICCWt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) UA | |||||
| Base + UA*6 | 3 | 42.6 | 49.22 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Base + UA*10 | 3 | 44.3 | 50.92 | 1.7 | 0.17 |
| Base + UA*1 | 3 | 45.14 | 51.75 | 2.54 | 0.11 |
| Base | 3 | 46.01 | 52.63 | 3.41 | 0.07 |
| Base + UA*2 | 3 | 46.03 | 52.65 | 3.43 | 0.07 |
| Base + UA*7 | 3 | 48.19 | 54.81 | 5.59 | 0.02 |
| Base + UA*9 | 3 | 48.99 | 55.61 | 6.39 | 0.02 |
| Base + UA*17 | 3 | 48.99 | 55.61 | 6.39 | 0.02 |
| Base + UA*5 | 3 | 49.13 | 55.75 | 6.53 | 0.02 |
| Base + UA*11 | 3 | 49.48 | 56.1 | 6.88 | 0.01 |
| Base + UA*4 | 3 | 49.72 | 56.33 | 7.11 | 0.01 |
| Base + UA*15 | 3 | 49.87 | 56.48 | 7.26 | 0.01 |
| Base + UA*16 | 3 | 49.87 | 56.48 | 7.26 | 0.01 |
| Base + UA*14 | 3 | 49.87 | 56.48 | 7.26 | 0.01 |
| Base + UA*12 | 3 | 50.13 | 56.75 | 7.53 | 0.01 |
| Base + UA*13 | 3 | 50.13 | 56.75 | 7.53 | 0.01 |
| Base + UA*3 | 3 | 50.37 | 56.99 | 7.77 | 0.01 |
| Base + UA*8 | 3 | 50.43 | 57.04 | 7.82 | 0.01 |
| (b) UC | |||||
| Base | 2 | 43.15 | 47.45 | 0 | 0.31 |
| Base + UC*3 | 3 | 41.25 | 47.86 | 0.42 | 0.25 |
| Base + UC*4 | 3 | 41.25 | 47.86 | 0.42 | 0.25 |
| Base + UC*2 | 3 | 43.12 | 49.74 | 2.29 | 0.1 |
| Base + UC*1 | 3 | 43.14 | 49.76 | 2.31 | 0.1 |
The model in bold is the best model supported by the data.
Abbreviations: AICCWt, model weight; k, number of parameters; ΔAICC, increase in AICC compared to the top model.