Table 5.
Crude and adjusted odds ratios from binary logistic regression for variables associated with unprotected anal sex practices during the last six months in sureveyed men who have sex with men in Manzanillo, Mexico, 2019.
Variables | Unprotected anal Sex n (%) | Odds Ratios (95% Confidence Intervals) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (n = 102) | No (n = 40) | Univariate | Multivariate 1 | |
Syndemic of psychosocial stressors | ||||
No (0–2 events) | 45 (62.5) | 27 (37.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Yes (3–7 events) | 57 (81.4) | 13 (18.6) | 2.6 (1.22–5.67) * | 3.5 (1.25–10.0) * |
Experienced stigma (score) | ||||
No stigma (≤13) | 26 (70.3) | 11 (29.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Low (14–20) | 35 (72.9) | 13 (27.1) | 1.0 (0.43–2.69) | 1.2 (0.34–4.34) |
High (≥21) | 41 (71.9) | 16 (28.1) | 1.1 (0.44–2.94) | 5.9 (1.42–24.9) * |
Drug use related to sex intercourse | ||||
No | 47 (61.0) | 30 (39.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Yes | 55 (84.6) | 10 (15.4) | 3.5 (1.55–7.92) ** | 3.5 (1.85–6.48) *** |
HIV-related knowledge level | ||||
Low (1–5 correct answers) | 53 (77.9) | 15 (22.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
High (6–7 correct answers) | 49 (66.2) | 25 (33.8) | 0.5 (0.26–1.17) | 0.4 (0.14–0.96) * |
Friends/acquaintances with HIV | ||||
No | 32 (54.2) | 27(45.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Yes | 70 (84.3) | 13(15.7) | 2.1 (1.43–3.11) *** | 2.8 (1.71–4.67) *** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001; 1 Hosmer & Lemeshow adjustment dependability test p-value = 0.25.