Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD008984. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008984.pub2

Badner 2000.

Methods Single‐centre RCT
Participants Setting: McMaster University, Canada
Inclusion criteria: ASA I‐III patients, age > 18 years, presenting for elective carotid endarterectomy
Exclusion criteria: patients were excluded if they had received an anaesthetic within 30 days before their scheduled surgery, if they were currently taking medications known to affect plasma homocysteine (vitamins B12 and B6, folic acid, penicillamine, methotrexate, azaurodine, isoniazid, cycloserine, phenelzine, or procarbazine); if they were vitamin B12 or folate deficient, malnourished or cirrhotic; or if they had a pace‐maker or left bundle branch block on electrocardiogram (ECG)
Participant numbers: 90 randomly assigned; 86 analysed
Interventions Intervention: anaesthesia was maintained with opioid (fentanyl or sufentanil), isoflurane, and nitrous oxide/oxygen (inspired nitrous oxide 50%).
 Control: anaesthesia was maintained with opioid (fentanyl and sufentanil), isoflurane, and oxygen/air.
Outcomes Other outcomes: 
 Myocardial ischaemia
Notes Four patients did not complete the 48‐h study period, two required reoperation for hematoma formation (both non‐nitrous oxide), and two patients had Holter monitoring inappropriately discontinued (one from each group).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Patients were randomized using a computer‐generated random number table."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk This was not reported.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Inhospital case fatality rate/length of stay Unclear risk
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Complications Low risk Quote: "Myocardial ischemia was determined by a blinded technician."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Missing outcome data balanced in numbers across intervention groups, with similar reasons for missing data across groups.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes described in methods section reported.
Other bias Low risk No other potential sources of bias were detected.