Larsen 2000.
Methods | Single‐centre RCT | |
Participants |
Setting: University of Saarland, Germany Inclusion criteria: ASA I‐II patients, aged 18–65 year, scheduled for elective operative procedures Exclusion criteria: a history of a significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal disease; chronic drug or alcohol abuse; morbid obesity; disabling neuropsychiatric disorders; hypersensitivity to aesthetics or familial history of malignant hyperthermia; women who were pregnant or breast‐feeding; patients who refused to give consent Participant numbers: 60 randomly assigned; 60 analysed |
|
Interventions | Intervention: before the induction of anaesthesia, all patients received fentanyl 2 μg/kg IV, then breathed 100% oxygen for 3 min. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg IV. After loss of consciousness, patients received either desflurane at an endtidal concentration of 5% or sevoflurane 1.7% and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Maintenance of anaesthesia was provided with the respective volatile anaesthetic (0.85 MAC concentration with nitrous oxide 65% in oxygen; the inspired concentration was adjusted to maintain mean arterial pressure within 20% of baseline values. Control: patients were infused with remifentanil at a rate of 0.5 μg/kg/min until they felt dazed. Thereafter, anaesthesia was induced by propofol in a dose adequate for loss of eye‐lash reflex, followed by rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg for tracheal intubation. After intubation, remifentanil infusion was reduced to 0.25 μg/kg/min, and a propofol infusion was started at a rate of 3 mg/kg/min and maintained throughout surgery. During the maintenance of anaesthesia, patients were ventilated with a fresh gas flow of 2 L/min of oxygen 35% in air by using a semiclosed circle system. No inhaled anaesthetics were given. | |
Outcomes |
Other outcomes: Quality of recovery |
|
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomized but no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "The assignment of patients was single blinded." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Inhospital case fatality rate/length of stay | Unclear risk | — |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Complications | Low risk | Quote: "Observer was blinded to the anaesthesia the patients had received." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes described in methods section reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other potential sources of bias were detected. |