Sengupta 1988.
Methods | Single‐centre RCT | |
Participants |
Setting: a hospital in London, UK Inclusion criteria: 80 ASA I‐II patients older than 18 years undergoing a standard anaesthetic technique for day‐case laparoscopy Exclusion criteria: patients with a history of excessive nausea and vomiting after previous anaesthetics Participant numbers: 80 randomly assigned; 64 analysed |
|
Interventions | Intervention: patients were given fentanyl 1.5 μg/kg intravenous and anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg intravenous followed by vecuronium 0.06 mg/kg intravenous. The patients received an inspired gas mixture of 33% nitrous oxide and 1% enflurane in oxygen. Control: patients were given fentanyl 1.5 μg/kg intravenous and anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg intravenous followed by vecuronium 0.06 mg/kg intravenous. The patients received an inspired gas mixture of 1% enflurane in oxygen. | |
Outcomes |
Secondary outcomes: Severe nausea and vomiting: patient rated |
|
Notes | 16 patients had not returned questionnaires | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomized but no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | This was not reported. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Inhospital case fatality rate/length of stay | Unclear risk | — |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Complications | Unclear risk | This was not reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes described in methods section reported. |
Other bias | High risk | Fewer than 50 participants per arm. |