Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 14;25(3):654–666. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.11.017

Table 4.

Factors and comparison between actual (Y) and predicted (FIT) responses.

Run order Temperature (X1) Pressure (X2) Feed flow rate (X3) Responses Particle size (μm)

Y FIT
1 60 160 2.5 90.930 88.855
2 60 140 2.5 37.670 37.780
3 40 150 1.0 24.580 23.025
4 40 140 2.5 28.620 30.695
5 50 160 4.0 54.640 55.160
6 50 150 2.5 37.670 37.670
7 40 160 2.5 33.910 33.800
8 40 150 4.0 26.490 26.080
9 50 150 2.5 37.670 37.670
10 60 150 1.0 54.640 55.050
11 50 160 1.0 54.640 56.305
12 50 140 1.0 26.490 25.970
13 50 140 4.0 32.980 31.315
14 50 150 2.5 37.670 37.670
15 60 150 4.0 54.640 56.195