Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Apr 28;6(7):964–974. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01340-8

Table 3:

Moderation results in antecedent and consequence suicidal thought analyses.

Suicidal Thoughts Antecedent
Moderator
β (SE) 95% CI LB 95% CI UB
# of prompts 0.02 (0.01) −0.01 0.05
# of hours −0.00 (0.01) −0.02 0.01
Frequency of SITB −0.03 (0.14) −0.31 0.25
Compliance 0.04 (0.24) −0.42 0.53
% women −0.02 (0.35) −0.71 0.67
% white 0.37 (0.36) −0.38 1.06
Mean age 0.00 (0.01) −0.01 0.01
BPD (1 = Yes; 0 = No) 0.01 (0.09) −0.16 0.19
Sampling (1 = EMA; 0 = Daily Diary) 0.11 (0.09) −0.05 0.29
Timing (1 = Concurrent; 0 = Lagged) 0.12 (0.16) −0.19 0.46
Suicidal Thoughts Consequence
β (SE) 95% CI LB 95% CI UB
# of prompts −0.00 (0.05) −0.11 0.11
# of hours −0.01 (0.02) −0.05 0.03
Frequency of SITB 0.20 (0.31) −0.41 0.79
Compliance −0.06 (0.35) −0.73 0.62
% women 0.41 (0.40) −0.38 1.19
% white −0.21 (0.41) −1.01 0.59
Mean age 0.01 (0.02) −0.03 0.05
BPD (1 = Yes; 0 = No) −0.08 (0.23) −0.54 0.38
Sampling (1 = EMA; 0 = Daily Diary) −0.21 (0.22) −0.63 0.23
Timing (1 = Concurrent; 0 = Lagged) −0.08 (0.32) −0.70 0.54