Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 27;12:12811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16984-9

Table 4.

Difference in effect size in each functional status measure before and after admission between the PAC and non-PAC groups.

Measures Non-PAC ES of after admission versus before PAC ES of after admission versus before Mean difference in ES of PAC versus Non-PAC (95% CI)
(n = 212) (n = 122)
Before After Before After
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Primary outcome
BI 37.11 ± 23.55 52.52 ± 26.03 0.54 37.06 ± 23.96 68.07 ± 27.47 1.08 0.54 (0.38–0.71) *
Secondary outcome
FOIS 5.81 ± 2.04 6.33 ± 1.46 0.23 5.84 ± 1.93 6.69 ± 1.07 0.37 0.14 (− 0.01–0.30)
MNA-SF 10.67 ± 2.20 11.43 ± 2.00 0.33 10.38 ± 1.57 11.74 ± 1.73 0.59 0.26 (0.10–0.42) *
EQ-5D 0.05 ± 0.32 0.21 ± 0.31 0.36 0.02 ± 0.38 0.40 ± 0.34 0.86 0.50 (0.33–0.66) *
IADL 4.33 ± 2.96 4.59 ± 2.83 0.12 3.60 ± 2.03 4.86 ± 2.51 0.56 0.44 (0.28–0.60) *
MMSE 20.02 ± 9.36 22.02 ± 8.99 0.31 20.50 ± 9.06 24.57 ± 7.83 0.65 0.34 (0.17–0.50) *

SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval, ES effect size, PAC post-acute care, BI Barthel index, FOIS functional oral intake scale, MNA-SF mini nutrition assessment-short form, EQ-5D EuroQoL-5D, IADL Lawton–Brody instrumental activities of daily living scale, MMSE mini-mental state exam.

*p value < 0.05.