Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 22;14(15):3008. doi: 10.3390/nu14153008

Table 1.

Background data of the study cohort stratified by type of vitamin D oral supplementation.

No Supplementation (n = 59) Low Dose (n = 63) High Dose (n = 76) p-Value *
Age 0.255
<25 12 (20.3%) 14 (22.2%) 11 (14.5%)
25–34 38 (64.4%) 44 (69.8%) 49 (64.5%)
>34 9 (15.3%) 5 (7.9%) 16 (21.1%)
Gravidity 0.288
2 50 (84.7%) 48 (76.2%) 56 (73.7%)
>2 9 (15.3%) 15 (23.8%) 20 (26.3%)
Parity 0.931
1 39 (66.1%) 46 (73.0%) 53 (69.7%)
2 11 (18.6%) 10 (15.9%) 14 (18.4%)
≥3 9 (15.3%) 7 (11.1%) 9 (11.8%)
Area of residence 0.958
Urban 35 (59.3%) 38 (60.3%) 44 (57.9%)
Rural 24 (40.7%) 25 (39.7%) 32 (42.1%)
Occupation 0.662
No occupation 4 (6.8%) 7 (11.1%) 11 (14.5%)
Student 4 (6.8%) 6 (9.5%) 6 (7.9%)
Employed 51 (86.4%) 50 (79.4%) 59 (77.6%)
Level of education 0.292
Elementary 3 (5.1%) 6 (9.5%) 10 (13.2%)
Middle 18 (30.5%) 12 (19.0%) 14 (18.4%)
Higher 39 66.1%) 45 (71.4%) 52 (68.4%)
Level of income 0.963
Low 6 (10.2%) 6 (9.5%) 8 (10.5%)
Middle 33 (55.9%) 38 (60.3%) 41 (53.9%)
High 20 (33.9%) 19 (30.2%) 27 (35.5%)
Civil status 0.937
Married 54 (91.5%) 57 (90.5%) 68 (89.5%)
Single 2 (3.4%) 3 (4.8%) 5 (6.6%)
Divorced/Widowed 3 (5.1%) 3 (4.8%) 3 (3.9%)

* Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.