TABLE 5.
Characteristics of the participants in included articles.
| Study | Sample size (N) Final (Initial) | Level | Sex | Age (years)(mean ± SD) | Stature (cm)(mean ± SD) | Body mass (kg)(mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term effect of basketball training periods on salivary marker levels | ||||||
| Andre et al. 2018 [26] | 12 | Elite Collegiate | Male | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Arruda et al. 2013 [23] | 12 | Elite | Female | 26.2 ± 3.9 | 183.1 ± 9.8 | 74.5 ± 10.1 |
| Atalag et al. 2019 [32] | Basketball players: 36 | Sub-Elite Collegiate | Male | Basketball players 21.32 ± 1.7 | Basketball players 191.43 ± 9.02 | Basketball players98.99 ± 16.15 |
| Gonzalez-Bono et al.2002 [51] | 18 Team 1 (T1) (N = 10) Team 2 (T2) (N = 8) |
Elite | Male | T1: 21.60 ± 1.07 # T2: 21.50 ± 1.69 # |
T1: 195 ± 0.02 # T2: 195 ± 0.03 # |
T1: 90.79 ± 3.73 # T2: 93.56 ± 3.34 # |
| He et al. 2010 [25] | 8 | Sub-Elite Collegiate | Male | 20.5 ± 0.3 # | 176.6 ± 2.0 # | 75.1 ± 3.9 # |
| Moreira et al. 2011 [40] | 15 | Elite | Male | 19 ± 0.6 | 192 ± 10 | 92 ± 9 |
| Nunes et al. 2011(a) [15] | 12 | Elite | Female | 26.2 ± 3.9 | 183.1 ± 9.8 | 82.2 ± 13.1 |
| Nunes et al. 2014 [18] | 19 | Elite | Female | 26 ± 5 | 181.8 ± 7.2 | 75.6 ± 12.6 |
| Miloski et al. 2015 [36] | 16 (23) | Brazilian state youth | Male | 15.3 ± 0.7* | 186.1 ± 8.9* | 82.4 ± 14.6* |
| Azarbayjani et al. 2011 [21] | 20 | Amateur | Male | 24.4 ± 3.6 | 184 ± 10 | 83.5 ± 3.6 |
| Moraes et al. 2017 [22] | 23 | Brazilian state youth | Male | 15.8 ± 0.8 | n/a | 82.7 ± 13.0 |
| Moreira et al. 2008 [42] | 10Basketball players (B) (N = 5) Coaching staff (C) (N = 5) |
Elite | Male | B: 23 ± 2 C: 40 ± 6 |
B: 206 ± 4 C: 177 ± 5 |
B: 116 ± 11 C: 83 ± 7 |
| Short-term effect of basketball training periods on salivary marker levels | ||||||
| Moreira et al. 2018 [19] | 32 [48] U14 (N = 14) U15 (N = 10) U16 (N = 8) |
Elite | Male | 15.2 ± 1.2 | 180 ± 11 | 72 ± 15 |
| Nunes et al. 2011(b) [41] | 14 | Elite | Female | 26.2 ± 3.9 | 183.1 ± 9.8 | 74.5 ± 10.1 |
| Sansone et al. 2018 [16] | 12 | Sub-Elite | Male | 21 ± 2 | 193.9 ± 7.0 | 84.8 ± 6.6 |
Note: n/a – not provided;
– average data reported for initial sample size; SD – standard deviation.
– data reported as mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean).