TABLE 8.
Study | Marker | Measures | Level (mean ± SD) | Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Moreira et al. 2018 [19] | C | Pre-control to post-SSG | Not provided | ES from 0.00 to 0.15 Small and unclear change |
Pre-experimental Stroop to post-SSG | ||||
Post-control to post-SSG | ||||
Post-experimental Stroop to post-SSG | ||||
T | Pre-control to post-SSG | Not provided | ES (90% CI) = 0.98 (0.42;1.50) Large and clear increase |
|
Pre-experimental Stroop to post-SSG | ES (90% CI) = 0.33 (-0.18; 0.83) Small-to-moderate difference |
|||
Post-control to post-SSG | ES (90% CI) = 0.66 (0.13;1.16) Moderate and clear increase |
|||
Post-experimental Stroop to post-SSG | ES (90% CI) = 0.37 (-0.14;0.86) Small-to-moderate and unclear change |
|||
AA | Pre-control to post-SSG | Not provided | ES (90% CI) = 0.82 (0.22; 1.38) Large and clear increase |
|
Pre-experimental Stroop to post-SSG | ES (90% CI) = 0.55 (0.00;1.10) Moderate increase |
|||
Post-control to post-SSG | ES (90% CI) = 0.44 (-0.12;0.99) Moderate and unclear increase |
|||
Post-experimental Stroop to post-SSG | ES (90% CI) = 0.13 (-0.40;0.67) Small and unclear difference |
|||
Nunes et al. 2011(b) [41] | C | Comparison of non-exercising day (NE) and post-endurance training scheme (ES) | Not provided (Increased) | p < 0.05 |
Comparison of NE and strength-hypertrophy training scheme (SHS) | p < 0.05 | |||
Comparison of NE and power training scheme (PS) | p < 0.05 | |||
Pre- to post-SHS | p < 0.05 | |||
Comparison of post-SHS and post-ES and post-PS | p < 0.08 | |||
T | Pre- to post-endurance (ES), strength-hypertrophy (SHS) and power (PS) schemes | Not provided | p > 0.05 | |
Comparison of ES, SHS and PS with levels from non-exercising day (NE) | p > 0.05 | |||
Time effect (7:30, pre, post and 17:30) on levels of testosterone during ES, SHS, PS and NE days. | p > 0.05 | |||
IgA | Pre- to post-endurance (ES), strength-hypertrophy (SHS) and power (PS) schemes | Not provided | p > 0.05 | |
Comparison of ES, SHS and PS with levels from non-exercising day (NE) | p > 0.05 | |||
Time effect (7:30, pre, post and 17:30) during ES, SHS, PS and NE days | p > 0.05 | |||
Sansone et al. 2018 [16] | C | Pre-small-sided game concentrations | Off-long: 6.7 ± 4.7 ng/ml Off-short: 7.3 ± 2.2 ng/ml D-long: 8.1 ± 4.3 ng/ml D-short: 6.6 ± 1.4 ng/ml |
p = 0.599 |
Interaction between time, task and regime | Not provided | p = 0.350 | ||
Interaction between task and regime | p = 0.295 | |||
Interaction between task and time | p = 0.485 | |||
Interaction between regime and time | p = 0.757 | |||
Interaction for time | p = 0.001 | |||
Interaction for task | p = 0.694 | |||
Interaction for regime | p = 0.128 | |||
T | Pre-small-sided game concentrations | Pre-off-long: 200.7 ± 86.7 pg/ml Pre-off-short: 260.5 ± 155.9 pg/ml Pre-D-long: 159.3 ± 94.7 pg/ml Pre-D-short: 175.1 ± 183.1 pg/ml Post-off-long: 239.4 ± 122.2 pg/ml Post-off-short: 192.2 ± 152.9 pg/ml Post-D-long: 251.8 ± 104.3 pg/ml Post-D-short: 249.0 ± 130.22 pg/ml |
p = 0.227 | |
Comparison of post-small-sided games concentrations | p > 0.05 | |||
Pre- to post-offensive-long | p > 0.05 | |||
Pre- to post-offensive-short | p = 0.028 | |||
Pre- to post-defensive-long | p = 0.037 | |||
Pre- to post-defensive-short | p > 0.05 |
Note: C – cortisol, T – testosterone; AA – alpha-amylase; IgA – immunoglobulin A; NE – non-exercising day; ES – muscle endurance training scheme; SHS – strength-hypertrophy training scheme; PS – power training scheme; Off-long – long-intermittent training regime with offensive task; Off-short – short-intermittent training regime with offensive task; D-long – long-intermittent training regime with defensive task; D-short – short-intermittent training regime with defensive task.