Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 3;39(3):485–497. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.107024

TABLE 3.

The results of risk of bias assessment

Studies Items
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Score
Bogdanis et al.[27] 1 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 13
Appleby et al.[26] 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 18
Gonzalo-Skok et al.[24] 1 2 1 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 12
Speirs et al.[28] 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 18
Botton et al.[29] 1 0 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 14
Fisher et al.[32] 1 2 2 2 1 0 2 0 2 2 14
Makaruk et al.[30] 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 15
McCurdy et al.[31] 1 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 15
Taniguchi et al.[43] 1 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 13
Ramirez-Campillo et al.[40] 1 2 2 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 15
Stern et al.[25] 1 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 2 2 16
Krajewski et al.[44] 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 2 2 17
Javier Nunez et al.[42] 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 2 2 1 12
Gonzalo-Skok et al.[41] 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 18