Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 25;10(8):1783. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081783

Table 1.

Summary of microbiome research in bladder cancer.

Material Author Cohorts and Diversity Abundance and Other Findings
Urine Popovic et al. [29]
  • -

    Cancer vs. healthy

  • -

    No significant difference between groups

  • -

    No significant difference between cancer and healthy group

Wu et al. [30]
  • -

    Cancer vs. healthy

  • -

    Increased alpha diversities in cancer group

  • -

    More abundant Aeromonas, Acinetobacter, Bacteroides in cancer group

  • -

    More abundant Proteus, Laceyella, Serratia in healthy group

Bi et al. [31]
  • -

    Cancer vs. healthy

  • -

    Increased alpha diversities in cancer group

  • -

    More abundant Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Veillonella in healthy group

  • -

    More abundant Actinomyces europaeus in cancer group

Chipollini et al. [33]
  • -

    Cancer vs. healthy

  • -

    Decreased alpha diversities in cancer group

  • -

    No significant difference between cancer and healthy group

Zeng et al. [38]
  • -

    Cancer vs. healthy

  • -

    Recurrent vs. nonrecurrent cancer

  • -

    Increased alpha diversities in cancer group compared to healthy group

  • -

    Increased alpha diversities in recurrent group compared to nonrecurrent group

  • -

    No significant difference between cancer and healthy group

  • -

    More abundant Lactobacillus in nonrecurrent group compared to recurrent group

Hussein et al. [39]
  • -

    Cancer vs. healthy

  • -

    Different beta diversities between cancer and healthy group

  • -

    More abundant Lactobacillus in healthy cohort

Ma et al. [41]
  • -

    Cancer vs. healthy

  • -

    Nonsmoker vs. smoker

  • -

    Decreased alpha diversities in smokers with cancer compared to nonsmokers with cancer

  • -

    More abundant Lactobacillus in nonsmoking patients

Hourigan et al. [34]
  • -

    Midstream urine vs. cystoscopy

  • -

    Male vs. female

  • -

    No significant difference according to urine collection methods and gender

  • -

    Stenotrophomonas increased in cystocopy

  • -

    Tepidomonas increased in males

  • -

    Prevotella and Veillonella increased in females

Oresta et al. [42]
  • -

    Cancer vs. healthy

  • -

    Midstream urine vs. catheterized urine

  • -

    Catheterized urine vs. washout urine

  • -

    Increased alpha diversities in cancer patients

  • -

    Veillonella, Corynebacterium increased in cancer patients

  • -

    Ruminococcus, Enterobacteriaceae increased in healthy controls

  • -

    Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Corynebacterium, Fusobacterium increased in midstream urine

  • -

    Ruminococcaceae decreased in midstream urine

  • -

    Buckholderiaceae, Faeclibacterium, Erysipelatoclostridium, Veillonella, Streptococcus differ between catheterized and washout urines

Tissue Li et al. [32]
  • -

    Carcinoma vs. adjacent normal tissue

  • -

    Lower alpha diversities in cancerous tissues

  • -

    More abundant Lactobacillus, Prevotella, Ruminococcaceae in normal tissue

  • -

    More abundant Cupriavidus, Acinetobacter, Anoxybacillus, Escherichia-Shigella, Geobacillus, Pelomonas, Ralstonia, Sphingomonas in cancerous tissue

Rodriguez et al. [37]
  • -

    Carcinoma vs. adjacent normal tissue (TCGA, WES)

  • -

    More abundant Cutibacterium acnes, Mathylobacterium radiotolerans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida in bladder cancer tissues

Li et al. [40]
  • -

    MIBC tissue only (TCGA, WTS)

  • -

    Relevance between microbial abundances, EMT/fibrosis/ECM-related genes, and clinical variables

Chen et al. [43]
  • -

    NMIBC tissue with PD-L1 (+) vs. PD-L1(-)

  • -

    Increased alpha diversities in PD-L1 (+) tissues

  • -

    More abundant Leptotrichia and less abundant Prevotella in PD-L1 (+) tissues

Urine and Tissue Mansour et al. [35]
  • -

    10 urines matched with 14 tissues from cancer patients

  • -

    Catheterized urine vs. cancer tissue

  • -

    Comparisons between age groups and genders

  • -

    Increased alpha diversities in male tissues

  • -

    Different age group, gender, sample type showed different microbial abundances

  • -

    Different tissues from same patient showed almost same microbial compositions

  • -

    Microbiome between urine and tissue are shared

Pederzoli et al. [36]
  • -

    Matched midstream urines, tumorous tissues, and non-tumorous tissues from 21 men and 8 men

  • -

    Midstream urines from 20 patients and 59 healthy controls

  • -

    Significant differences in microbial abundances between patients’ urines and healthy controls’ urines

  • -

    Tumorous tissues showed more Burkholderia

  • -

    More than 80% of the bacterial families were shared between urine and tissue microbiome