Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 23;29(8):5223–5237. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080415

Table 1.

Overview of included randomized controlled trials sorted by year of the end of enrollment.

Lorvidhaya
[14]
Dueňas-
González
[13]
Kim
[15]
Tangjitgamol
[16]
Mileshkin
OUTBACK [17]
Year of publication 2003 2012 2008 2019 2021
Country Thailand Multiple a Korea Thailand Multiple b
Outcomes
The main result favors ACT no yes no no no
Overall survival (HR) 1.41 c 0.68 0.92 c 1.42 0.90
(95% CI) (0.79; 2.16) (0.49; 0.95) (0.53; 1.59) (0.81; 2.49) (0.70; 1.17)
Randomization Stratified e Minimization d Stratified f Stratified g Stratified h
Concealed allocation no yes no not clear/yes no
Masking/blinding no no no outcome ass no
Patients
Number of patients randomized 230/233 259/256 78/77 130/129 461/465
Enrollment (start-end year) 1988–1994 2002–2004 1998–2005 2015–2017 2011–2017
Duration of enrollment (years) 6 2 7 2 6
Patient median age (years) 50/48 i 45/46 58/57 49/50 46/45
Range of patient age (years) <65 22–68/18–70 36–75/34–73 23–68/26–68 j 21–99/22–88
Disease
Stage (%)
IB1 (all node+), IB2, IIA 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 33/33
IIB 43/50 62/61 67/75 65/62 43/43
IIIA 1/1 <1/<1 6/3 1/3 0/0
IIIB 55/49 36/37 22/17 31/35 24/24 k
IVA 0/0 2/2 5/5 3/0 -
Median tumor diameter (cm) n.a. 6/6 5/5 l 5/5 5/5
Histology (%)
Squamous cell carcinoma 90/88 93/94 m 96/95 77/76 83/79
Adenocarcinoma 6/9 7/6 3/3 20/22 15/17
Adenosquamous carcinoma 1/0 - 1/3 2/2 3/4
Small-cell carcinoma 3/3 - 0/0 0/0 0/0
Positive pelvic lymph nodes yes n.a. yes yes yes
Para-aortic lymph nodes >1 cm yes no n no no no
Previous chemotherapy or RT no no no yes o yes p
Intervention (%)
Completed CCRT 95 n.a. 73 80 83
Received at least one ACT dose n.a. 86 n.a. 77 78
Completed CCRT + ACT 92 77 65 65 62
CCRT in control arm
(cycle × DRUG mg/m2 or AUC)
2 × MIT 10
2 × FU 300 mg/day
6 × CIS 40 6 × CIS 30 6 × CIS 40 5 × CIS 40
CCRT in ACT arm 2 × MIT 10
2 × FU 300 mg/day
6 × CIS 40
6 × GEM 125
2 × CIS 20
2 × FU 1000
6 × CIS 40 5 × CIS 40
ACT protocol 3 × FU 200 mg/day 2 × CIS 50
2 × GEM 1000
1 × CIS 20
1 × FU 1000
3 × PAC 175
3 × CAR 5
4 × PAC 155
4 × CAR 5
Follow-up
Median follow-up (months) q 89 46 39 27 60

Data are presented in CCRT + ACT arm/in control CCRT only arm if not stated otherwise. Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CCRT, concurrent chemoradiation; ACT, adjuvant (consolidation) chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy; n.a., not available; CIS, cisplatin; GEM, gemcitabine; FU, fluorouracil; PAC, paclitaxel; CAR, carboplatin; A, AUC; MIT, mitomycin C. a Mexico, Argentina, India, Panama, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Peru, Thailand, Pakistan, Australia; b Australia, New Zealand, USA, Saudi Arabia, Canada, China, Singapore; c HR was calculated by Parmar [37] and Tierney [38] methods; d Minimization using Pocock and Simon algorithm [39], balancing disease stage (IIB vs. III-IVA), tumor diameter (<5 cm vs. ≥5 cm), study center (not clear, probably 9 that is one per country), radiation equipment (cobalt-60 vs. linear accelerator), age (<55 vs. ≥55 years); e Stratified for six study centers; f Stratified for tumor stage; g Mixed block with stratification for disease stage (IIV vs. III-IVA) and histopathology (squamous vs. adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma); h Stratified for nodal status, participating site, FIGO stage, age, planned extended-field radiotherapy; i Mean instead of median; j Interquartile range instead of range; k Including IIIB and IVA; l Estimated from categories (≤4; 4.1–6; 6.1–8; ≥8.1) weighted by frequencies; m Including squamous cell, poorly differentiated and adeno/squamous carcinoma; n Para-aortic lymph nodes >1 cm were exclusion criteria, but 2.3% in ACT arm and 4.7% in CCRT alone arm had at least one; o Previous chemotherapy was not an exclusion criterion, but all patients had newly diagnosed cervical cancer, so the previous chemotherapy/radiotherapy were allowed only for other cancers; p However, not for cervical cancer; q Rounded down to the last full month.