Skip to main content
. 2017 May 31;26(1):369–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2017.04.007

Table 1.

Quantitative summary of the protective effects of silymarin and POE on CCl4-induced hepatic damage based on histological observations.

Groups Injury of score

Vacuolization Hepatocellular Necrosis Inflammation
Control 0 0 0
CCl4 (0.175% CCl4/olive oil) 2.40 ± 0.20### 3.89 ± 0.99### 1.83 ± 0.14###
Silymarin: 0.2 g/kg + CCl4 0.63 ± 0.23** 2.00 ± 0.41 0.67 ± 0.15**
POE: 0.1 g/kg + CCl4 1.13 ± 0.26 3.14 ± 0.26 1.22 ± 0.13
POE: 0.5 g/kg + CCl4 1.29 ± 0.25 2.13 ± 0.40 0.67 ± 0.18*
POE: 1.0 g/kg + CCl4 0.75 ± 0.28** 1.50 ± 0.36* 0.63 ± 0.23**

To quantify the histological index of vacuolization and hepatocellular necrosis of liver; the liver damage was graded 0–4 as following: 0 = no visible cell damage; 1 = slight (1–25%); 2 = moderate (26–50%); 3 = moderate/severe (51–75%); 4 = severe/high (76–100%) [36]. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 10).

#

Indicates significant difference from the control group (###p < 0.001).

*

Indicates significant difference with respect to the CCl4 group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).