Skip to main content
. 2001 Dec;67(12):5488–5496. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5488-5496.2001

TABLE 4.

MIDc analysis of strains from eight identified species or genera, based on UV-B treatment

Species Resulta with the following treatment:
UV-B−
UV-B+
No. of isolates MIDc No. of isolates MIDc
Bacillus megaterium 47 51.6 (3.0) 24  53.1 (4.3) NS
Bacillus pumilus 15 38.3 (4.1) 12  35.4 (4.8) NS
Bacillus coagulans 10 180.0 (17.0) 24 208.3 (10.1) NS
Clavibacter michiganensis 46 187.0 (6.5) 35 207.1 (6.2) A
Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens 7 192.9 (18.2) 13 209.6 (13.5) NS
Pantoea agglomerans 11 70.5 (7.4) 23  75.0 (5.0) NS
Pantoea ananas 11 63.6 (6.2) 15  80.0 (2.7) A
Pseudomonas putida 9 66.7 (5.9) 13  73.1 (10.8) NS
All gram negativeb 46 60.9 (3.2) 65  73.1 (3.4) B
All gram positivec 150 109.3 (6.2) 132 142.6 (7.4) C
a

MIDcs are reported as the mean (standard error of the mean) in joules per square meter. Significant differences between mean UV-B+ and UV-B− MIDcs within a row were calculated using the Student t test and are as follows: A, P ≤ 0.05; B, P ≤ 0.01; C, P ≤ 0.001; NS, not significant, P > 0.05. 

b

Includes 65 (UV-B+) and 46 (UV-B−) strains identified by FAME analysis. 

c

Includes 132 (UV-B+) and 150 (UV-B−) strains identified by FAME analysis.