Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 29;101(30):e29576. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029576

Table 2.

Summary of clinical outcomes for each study.

Study Complication Revision Pain (VAS) ROM Function score Walking speed
Liu 2021 HTO 0 0 NC 134.2 ± 2.7 93.5 ± 5.0 (Lysholm) NC
UKA 0 0 133.4 ± 3.1 93.9 ± 4.1 (Lysholm)
Watanabe 2021 HTO NC NC NC 131.9 ± 8.2 80.8 ± 17.5 (Lysholm) NC
UKA 129.5 ± 12.3 82.4 ± 16.4 (Lysholm)
Rodkey 2021 HTO 24 4 NC NC NC NC
UKA 6 37
Lin 2021 HTO 2 NC NC NC 86.58 ± 4.28 (HSS) NC
UKA 1 87.72 ± 2.80 (HSS)
Jin 2021 HTO 1 7 NC 138.1 ± 3.7 86.6 ± 11.5 (HSS) NC
UKA 0 2 135.7 ± 10.0 88.8 ± 13.2 (HSS)
Zhang 2021 HTO 0 0 0.5 ± 0.7 NC 90.6 ± 8.7 (HSS) NC
UKA 2 1 0.5 ± 0.6 91.7 ± 7.2 (HSS)
Hou 2020 HTO NC NC 1.8 ± 0.9 121.1 ± 2.7 81.9 ± 14.3 (HSS) NC
UKA 1.9 ± 0.8 135.2 ± 1.6 82.6 ± 12.9 (HSS)
Chen 2020 HTO 0 0 NC NC 90.6 ± 2.0(Lysholm) NC
UKA 0 0 91.5 ± 1.7(Lysholm)
Jacquet 2020 HTO 5 0 1.0 ± 0.5 NC 61 ± 7(KSS) NC
UKA 0 0 0.9 ± 0.4 60 ± 9(KSS)
Song 2019 HTO NC 14 NC 135.3 ± 12.3 73.9 ± 15.3(KSS) 30.6 ± 16.6(WOMAC) NC
UKA 11 126.8 ± 13.3 71.0 ± 10.5(KSS) 32.9 ± 10.2(WOMAC)
Koh 2019 HTO 0 NC 2.6 ± 1.3 NC 24.2 ± 11.4(WOMAC) NC
UKA 0 2.2 ± 1.6 13.9 ± 6.4(WOMAC)
Kim 2019 HTO NC NC 4.7 NC NC NC
UKA 5.2
Ryu 2018 HTO 0 NC 2.2 ± 1.2 NC 16.5 ± 17.5(WOMAC) NC
87.4 ± 12.0(Lysholm)
UKA 0 1.5 ± 1.7 14.9 ± 16.9(WOMAC)
89.2 ± 10.2(Lysholm)
Cho 2018 HTO 0 NC NC 149.4 ± 9.4 95.1 ± 7.6(KSS) NC
UKA 1 146.8 ± 12.7 96.3 ± 8.5(KSS)
Zhao 2017 HTO NC NC 3.54 ± 0.50 126.13 ± 1.45 82.76 ± 8.13(HSS) NC
UKA 2.45 ± 0.47 128.94 ± 1.37 93.09 ± 8.69(HSS)
Maxwell 2017 HTO 18 19 NC NC 21 (FJS) NC
UKA 3 1 67(FJS)
Krych 2017 HTO NC 13 NC NC 80.2 ± 11.8(Lysholm) NC
UKA 11 90.0 ± 11.0(Lysholm)
Jeon 2017 HTO 2 NC 3.3077 ± 2.61119 NC 50.1727 ± 17.12898(IKDC) NC
UKA 1 2.2381 ± 2.16575 56.8667 ± 15.70697(IKDC)
Petersen 2016 HTO 2 NC NC NC 7/10/2/4(HSS, Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor) NC
UKA 1 14/7/2/2(HSS, Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor)
Tuncay 2015 HTO 6 0 NC NC OWHTO 83.95(HSS) NC
Demo-HTO 83.51(HSS)
UKA 1 3 90.00(HSS)
Yim 2013 HTO 3 NC NC 138.8 ± 4.7 89.6 ± 8.7(Lysholm) NC
UKA 2 130.0 ± 8.8 90.3 ± 7.7(Lysholm)
Takeuchi 2010 HTO 2 0 NC 146 ± 5.9 89 ± 7.6(KSS) NC
UKA 1 2 127 ± 16 88 ± 7.7(KSS)
Borjesson 2005 HTO NC NC 0 (0–2) (Borg-scale) 121 37(36–39) (BOA) NC
UKA 0 (0–2) (Borg-scale) 121 37(31–39) (BOA)
Stukenborg 2001 HTO 9 10 NC 117(85–135) 76(29–100) (KSS) NC
UKA 2 6 103(35–140) 74(31–94) (KSS)
Weale 1994 HTO NC 17 9/21 (no/mild) NC 31(BKS) NC
UKA 5 12/15 (no/mild) 34(BKS)
Weidenhielm 1992 HTO 2 NC 25 (No pain) NC 37 ± 2(BOA) 1.29 ± 0.16
UKA 1 28 (No pain) 38 ± 2(BOA) 1.3 ± 0.18
Ivarsson 1991 HTO NC NC 6.3 ± 2.1 (100 mm Analogous) 121 ± 11 78 ± 19(Lysholm) 1.35 ± 0.42
UKA 4.1 ± 2.9 (100 mm Analogous) 112 ± 13 91 ± 11(Lysholm) 1.20 ± 0.24
Jefferson 1989 HTO NC NC NC NC NC 1.02 ± 0.19
UKA 0.99 ± 0.21
Broughton 1986 HTO 17 10 23 (No or mild) NC 21 (BKS good number) NC
UKA 5 3 34 (No or mild) 32 (BKS good number)