Table 4.
Regression results of conditional process model for depressive symptoms, controlling for gender: threat appraisal moderates the indirect effect of intolerance of uncertainty on depressive symptoms
| Predictor | β | SE | T-statistic | p-value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rumination | |||||
| Intolerance of uncertainty (IU; a1) | .306 | .045 | 6.770 | < .001 | .217, .396 |
| Threat appraisal severity (a2) | .181 | .142 | 1.278 | .204 | − .099, .461 |
| IU × Rumination (a3) | − .019 | .009 | − 2.056 | .042 | − .038, − .001 |
| Depressive symptoms | |||||
| Intolerance of uncertainty (c1) | .234 | .050 | 4.649 | < .001 | .134, .334 |
| Rumination (b1) | .283 | .084 | 3.363 | .001 | .116, .449 |
| Threat appraisal severity (c2) | .041 | .136 | .303 | .762 | .228, .310 |
| IU × Rumination (c3) | .017 | .009 | 1.82 | .071 | − .001, .035 |
| Conditional indirect effects at threat appraisal severity values: M – 1 SD, M, M + 1 SD | |||||
| β | SE | 95% CI | |||
| M − 1 SD (− 3.649) | .107 | .044 | .031, .207 | ||
| M (.351) | .085 | .037 | .023, .168 | ||
| M + 1 SD (3.351) | .068 | .035 | .014, .147 | ||
95% CI 10,000 bootstrapped confidence intervals, SE standard error, M mean, SD standard deviation