2. Table 2.

Comparison between groups in attachment styles and dimensions

Table 2a. Comparison in attachment styles
Attachment style		Clinical1	Control
Secure attachment Insecure attachment	Preoccupied Avoidant	11 (26.2%) 31 (73.8%) 13 (31.0%) 18 (42.9%)	24 (66.7%) 12 (33.3%) 2 (5.6%) 10 (27.8%)
Table 2b. Differences in CAMIR-R' attachment dimensions
Dimensions	Clinical Mean (SD)	Control Mean (SD)	t	Cohen d
Secure Family concern Interference Permissiveness	41.12 (15.24) 49.38 (12.11) 56.11 (13.18) 61.97 (15.18)	52.11 (5.86) 37.20 (10.49) 46.65 (9.88) 46.65 (9.88)	-4.32** 4.71** 3.62* 1.73	0.95 1.08 0.81 0.39
Self-sufficiency	55.29 (10.91)	48.64 (7.83)	7.30**	0.70
Child traumatism	67.17 (15.80)	47.87 (6.14)	7.30**	1.61

1 One subject lost by the system * p<0,01; ** p<0,001