Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2021 Apr;53(2):874–897. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01386-4

Fig. 7:

Fig. 7:

Comparison of ADO, staircase, and random designs in the simulation of the delay discounting task. Simulations were conducted using the hyperbolic model with parameter values of k = 0.12 and τ = 1.5. The three designs are compared with root mean squared errors (RMSE; Panel A) and standard deviations of the posterior distribution (Panel B). Each curve represents an average across 1,000 independent simulation runs.