Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 26;77:100080. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100080

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review.

Author, year Country Income classification (WB) Study Type Model Perspective Time horizon Discount Rate Population Age (years) Index Test Reference Test
Andrés-Gamboa (2008) Colombia Upper-middle CEA Markov decision model Payer Throughout life 3% 21‒69 (cytology) HPV DNA Cervical smear
30‒69 (HPV DNA) Pap smear
Beal (2014) Mexico Upper-middle CEA, CA Decision Tree Model Healthcare system 3 to 5 years 5% 35‒64 HPV DNA Cervical smear
Pap smear
Caetano (2006) Brazil Upper-middle CEA Decision Tree Model Healthcare system 1 year Without Information 25‒59 HPV DNA Cervical smear
Pap smear
Campos (2015) India, Nicaragua and Uganda Lower-middle India and Nicaragua ACE, BIA Microsimulation model Health system and patient Throughout life 3% 25‒50 HPV DNA Cervical smear
Low: Uganda Pap smear
Campos (2017) Nicaragua Medium-Low CEA Microsimulation model Health system and patient Throughout life 3% 30‒59 HPV DNA Cervical smear
Pap smear
Flores (2011) Mexico Upper-middle CEA Decision Tree Model Healthcare system 1 year 3% 20‒80 HPV DNA Cervical smear
Pap smear
Goldie (2005) South Africa, India, Peru, Kenya and Thailand Upper-middle: South Africa, Peru and Thail and Lower-middle: India and Kenya CEA Markov decision model Health system and patient Throughout life 3% 1 × in life: 35 Hybrid Capture II HPV test Cervical smear
2 × in life: 35 and 40 Pap smear
3 × in life: 35, 40 and 45
Gutierrez-Delgado (2008) Mexico Upper-middle CEA Markov decision model Payer 20 years/intervention funding 3% 25‒64 (cytology) Hybrid Capture II HPV test Cervical smear
100 years/health benefits 30‒69 (HPV DNA) Pap smear
Levin (2010) China Upper-middle CEA Markov decision model Health system and patient Throughout life 3% 1 × in life: 35 Hybrid Capture II HPV test and HPV DNA Cervical smear
2 × in life: 35 and 40 Pap smear
3 × in life: 35, 40 and 45
Mandelblatt (2000). Thailand Upper-middle CBA Simulation model (Semi-Markov) Health system and patient Throughout life 3% 35‒55 Hybrid Capture II HPV test Cervical smear
Pap smear
Nahvijou (2014) Iran Upper-middle CMA Decision Tree Model Healthcare system Without Information Without Information 35 years HPV DNA Cervical smear
Pap smear
Nahvijou (2016) Iran Upper-middle CEA Markov decision model Healthcare system Throughout life 3% 21‒65 HPV DNA Cervical smear
Pap smear
Tantitamit (2015) Thailand Upper-middle CEA Decision Tree Model Health system and patient Without Information Without Information Without Information Hybrid Capture II HPV test Cervical smear
Pap smear
Termrungruanglert (2017) Thailand Upper-middle CEA Markov decision model Healthcare system 35 years 3% 35‒65 HPV DNA with 16/18 genotyping Cervical smear
Pap smear
Termrungruanglert (2019) Thailand Upper-middle ACE, BIA Markov decision model Healthcare system 10 years 3.5% 35‒65 HPV DNA with 16/18 genotyping Cervical smear
Pap smear

CEA, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; CA, Cost Analysis; CBA, Cost-Benefit Analysis; CMA, Cost-Minimization Analysis; BIA, Budget Impact Analysis; WB, World Bank.