Table 9.
Comparison of the results (%) attained with CoviWavNet and those of the related studies based on the SARS-COV-2-CT-Scan dataset.
| Article | Method | Acc | SE | SP | F1-score | Prec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [83] | Customized CNN | 95.00 | 96.00 | – | 95.00 | 95.00 |
| [48] | CoviDenseNet | 86.88 | 87.41 | 85.92 | 89.53 | 91.76 |
| [52] | x-DNN3 | 97.38 | 95.53 | – | 97.31 | 99.00 |
| [86] | Customized Simple CNN | 95.78 | 96.00 | 95.56 | – | – |
| [82] | Bi-LSTM | 98.37 | 98.87 | – | 98.14 | 98.74 |
| [47] | VGG-16+ResNet-50+Xception+Majority voting | 98.79 | 98.79 | 98.79 | 98.79 | 98.79 |
| [85] | Fuzzy Ranking + VGG-11, ResNet-50-2, and Inception v3 |
98.93 | 99.08 | 99.00 | 98.93 | 98.93 |
| [84] | Customized CNN+Genetic Algorithm+XBoost | 99.00 | 99.00 | – | 99.00 | 99.10 |
| [43] | ResNet18+ShuffleNet+AlexNet+ GoogleNet+DWT+GLCM+ Statistical features+PCA+SVM |
99.00 | 99.00 | 99.00 | 99.00 | 99.00 |
| Proposed | ResNet-50 trained with DWT heatmaps and CT images + C-SVM | 99.62 | 99.54 | 99.69 | 99.62 | 99.70 |
x-DNN is an explainable deep neural network.