Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2022 Aug 1;43(7):797–802. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003596

Table 1:

Demographic and cochlear implant characteristics of the study sample.

Variable N (%)

Sex
 Male 285 (40.4)
 Female 420 (59.6)
Marital Status
 Married/Domestic partnership 472 (67.0)
 Not Married/No domestic partnership 233 (33.0)
Combined Annual Household Income
 $0–$20,000 40 (5.7)
 $20,001–$50,000 129 (18.3)
 $50,001–$80,000 166 (23.5)
 $80,001–$110,000 125 (17.7)
 >$110,000 179 (25.4)
 Unknown/Not reported 66 (9.4)
Highest Level of Education
 Did not complete high school 3 (0.4)
 High school graduate or equivalent 46 (6.5)
 Some college/trade/technical/vocational training 125 (17.8)
 Associate degree 67 (9.5)
 Bachelor’s degree 221 (31.3)
 Master’s degree or higher 243 (34.5)
Employment Status
 Employed 311 (44.1)
 Not employed 90 (12.8)
 Retired 304 (43.1)
Residential Setting
 Urban 167 (23.7)
 Suburban 408 (57.9)
 Rural 130 (18.4)
Region of US
 West 176 (24.9)
 Midwest 158 (22.4)
 Northeast 96 (13.6)
 South/Southwest 262 (37.2)
 Unknown/Not reported 13 (1.8%)
CI Company
 Advanced Bionics 138 (19.6)
 Cochlear 343 (48.7)
 MED-EL 223 (31.6)
 Not reported 1 (0.1)
Listening Modality
 Bilateral CI 346 (49.1)
 CI and Hearing Aid 201 (28.5)
 CI without Hearing Aid 158 (22.4)
Combined electro-acoustic hearing (hybrid)
 No 678 (96.3)
 Yes 26 (3.7)
 No response 1 (0.1)