TABLE 1.
Variables | p value |
---|---|
Enrollment | |
Age, mean (range), y | 50 (22–87) |
Women | 83% |
Race | |
Asian | 8% |
Black | 10% |
White | 82% |
Latino | 13% |
Diagnosis | |
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) | 28% |
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) | 27% |
Undifferentiated connective tissue disorder (UCTD) | 8% |
Psoriatic arthritis | 8% |
Sjögren syndrome | 4% |
Mixed connective tissue disorder | 3% |
Othera | 22% |
Medications for rheumatic diseaseb | |
Conventional DMARDs | 84% |
Biologic DMARDs | 55% |
Follow-up | |
Rheumatic disease activity during pandemic | |
Typical | 36% |
More active | 31% |
Less active | 24% |
Unpredictable | 9% |
Current status of rheumatic disease | |
Excellent | 10% |
Very good | 22% |
Good | 41% |
Fair | 21% |
Poor | 6% |
How well coped psychologically during pandemic | |
Very well | 30% |
Well | 48% |
Neutral | 15% |
Fair | 4% |
Poor | 3% |
a Spondyloarthritis 2%, SLE/UCTD overlap 2%, Sjögren/RA overlap 2%, polymyalgia rheumatica 2%, antiphospholipid syndrome/SLE 2%, ankylosing spondylitis 2%, granulomatosis with polyangiitis 1%, RA/SLE overlap 1%, RA/polymyalgia rheumatica overlap 1%, inflammatory polyarthralgia 1%, small vessel vasculitis 1%, scleroderma 1%, Churg-Strauss syndrome 1%, Still's disease 1%, atypical polyarteritis nodosa 1%, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis 1%.
b Forty-one percent taking both conventional and biologic DMARDs.