Table 2.

Combinations of model parameters hypothesized by SR vs. ER Theory (de la Fuente, 2017, 2021a,b).

Combinations of levels				Regulation tendency	Stress	Stress
SR level (range)	ER level (range)	Avg.	Rank		Protection	Risk
3 (3.85–5.00) H	3 (2.84–5.00) H	3	5	High-High: High-Regulation	High protection	Low risk
2 (3.10–3.84) M	3 (2.84–5.00) H	2.5	4	Medium-High: Regulation	M-H protection	M-L risk
3 (3.85–5.00) H	2 (2.35–2.83) M	2.5	4	High-Medium: Regulation	M-H protection	M-L risk
2 (3.10–3.84) M	2 (2.35–2.83) M	2	3	Medium: Non-Regulation	Medium protection	M risk
2 (3.10–3.84) M	1 (1.00–2.34) L	1.5	2	Medium-Low: Dysregulation	M-L protection	M-H risk
1 (1.00–3.09) L	2 (2.35–2.83) M	1.5	2	Low-Medium: Dysregulation	M-L protection	M-H risk
1 (1.00–3.09) L	1 (1.00–2.34) L	1	1	Low-Low: High Dysregulation	Low protection	High risk

L, Low; M, Medium; H, High. Effects analyzed in this investigation. See previous research reports to analyze differences (de la Fuente et al., 2019a,b, p. 12; de la de la Fuente et al., 2020a,b,c,d,e,f,g, p. 5).