Table 7.
Effect of various Allium chinense extracts on feed intake and efficiency in high-fat-diet Wistar rats.a
| Groups | Feed intake (kg) | Feed efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| C | 2.21 ± 0.11 | 11.77 ± 1.29 |
| HF | 1.94 ± 0.10 | 17.47 ± 2.43 |
| HP | 2.18 ± 0.11 | 12.95 ± 1.92 |
| ABON | 1.97 ± 0.08 | 13.65 ± 2.54 |
| ABOH | 1.85 ± 0.07 | 12.95 ± 2.40 |
| ABWN | 1.92 ± 0.08 | 16.25 ± 1.48 |
| ABWH | 1.86 ± 0.04 | 14.52 ± 2.53 |
| ABRN | 1.89 ± 0.15 | 14.48 ± 2.10 |
| ABRH | 2.05 ± 0.04 | 14.61 ± 1.47 |
ABOH = A. chinense essential oil-high dose + HF; ABON = A. chinense essential oil-normal dose + HF; ABRH = A. chinense residue-high dose + HF; ABRN = Allium chinense residue-normal dose + HF; ABWH = A. chinense extracts-high dose + HF; ABWN = A. chinense extracts-normal dose + HF; C = normal diet; HF = high-fat diet; HP = Porbucol + HF; SD = standard deviation.
a
All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8) for eight Wistar rats per dietary group.