Table 3.
Bivariate analysis of KAP scores about CVD and participants distribution (N) (CVD vs Non-CVD) according to subcategories (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent).
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STUDY GROUPS | TOTAL | P.VALUE | |||
|
| |||||
| NON-CVD | CVD | ||||
|
| |||||
| Knowledge (Subjects’ distribution) |
Poor | 283 | 202 | 485 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| 61.4% | 43.9% | 52.7% | |||
|
| |||||
| Fair | 132 | 211 | 343 | ||
|
| |||||
| 28.6% | 45.9% | 37.2% | |||
|
| |||||
| Good | 43 | 46 | 89 | ||
|
| |||||
| 9.3% | 10.0% | 9.7% | |||
|
| |||||
| Excellent | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
|
| |||||
| 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.4% | |||
|
| |||||
| Knowledge score |
Mean (SD) | 23.5 (7.9) | 26.6 (5.2) | 25.0 (6.8) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Min – Max | 0 – 40 | 5–39 | 0–40 | ||
|
| |||||
| % Mean over 40 | 58.75% | 66.50% | 62.50% | ||
|
| |||||
| Attitude (Subjects’ distribution) | Poor | 140 | 98 | 238 | 0.006 |
|
| |||||
| 30.4% | 21.3% | 25.8% | |||
|
| |||||
| Fair | 188 | 224 | 412 | ||
|
| |||||
| 40.8% | 48.7% | 44.7% | |||
|
| |||||
| Good | 133 | 136 | 269 | ||
|
| |||||
| 28.9% | 29.6% | 29.2% | |||
|
| |||||
| Excellent | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
|
| |||||
| 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.2% | |||
|
| |||||
| Attitude score | Mean (SD) | 61.4 (12.4) | 63.3 (10.2) | 62.3 (11.4) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Min – Max | 21–82 | 29 – 83 | 21–83 | ||
|
| |||||
| % Mean over 85 | 72.23% | 74.47% | 73.29% | ||
|
| |||||
| Practice (Subjects’ distribution) | Poor | 224 | 267 | 491 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| 48.6% | 58.0% | 53.3% | |||
|
| |||||
| Fair | 63 | 101 | 164 | ||
|
| |||||
| 13.7% | 22.0% | 17.8% | |||
|
| |||||
| Good | 84 | 60 | 144 | ||
|
| |||||
| 18.2% | 13.0% | 15.6% | |||
|
| |||||
| Excellent | 90 | 32 | 122 | ||
|
| |||||
| 19.5% | 7.0% | 13.2% | |||
|
| |||||
| Practice score | Mean (SD) | 6.3 (2.2) | 6.0 (1.7) | 6.1 (2.0) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Min – Max | 1–9 | 2–9 | 1–9 | ||
|
| |||||
| % Mean over 9 | 70.00% | 66.66% | 67.77% | ||
|
| |||||