Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 29;12:13069. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17339-0

Table 5.

Comparison of the sensitivity for the RT-qPCR melting curve assay and Sanger sequencing for the training cohort.

All samples PCR assay Sanger sequencing PCR vs. Sanger
Conclusive Inconclusive % Conclusive Inconclusive % P-value
N501Y 80 2 97.6 56 26 68.3 1.814 × 10–6
E484K 78 4 95.1 55 27 67.1 1.146 × 10–5
K417N 76 6 92.7 55 27 67.1 9.801 × 10–5
P681H 78 4 95.1 47 35 57.3 3.746 × 10–8
N439K 81 1 98.7 56 26 68.3 4.338 × 10–7
Samples Ct > 31 PCR assay Sanger sequencing PCR vs. Sanger
Conclusive Inconclusive % Conclusive Inconclusive % P-value
N501Y 27 2 93.1 12 17 41.3 8.937 × 10–5
E484K 25 4 86.2 12 17 41.3 0.001043
K417N 23 6 79.3 11 18 37.9 0.003361
P681H 25 4 86.2 9 20 33.3 6.359 × 10–5
N439K 28 1 96.6 11 18 37.9 7.593 × 10–6

The samples are divided into two groups: conclusive and inconclusive. Conclusive is when a result was available of the analysis and inconclusive was when a result was not available. The analysis is made for all the samples and the samples with a low amount of viral SARS-CoV-2 RNA (Ct > 31).